- Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:07 pm
#76414
Hi cleo!
A couple thoughts to help clarify the passage and steer your thought process in a different direction.
First, the author says in lines 47-48 that "the specific effects of brevetoxin on dolphins are unknown," so it would be very unlikely that the author would then embrace a hypothesis suggesting brevetoxin does have some very specific effects on liver and immune function.
Second, when the author refers to that "alternate hypothesis," the immediately following sentence suggests that the "sudden influx of pollutants" are the root cause of the damage to the dolphins' systems (likely, though maybe not certainly, including the liver and immune disorders).
And last, when the author writes that brevetoxin "may have been a contributing factor," that is in a sentence talking in general about the "die-off," and not specifically about individual physical effects. So there the author seems to mean the brevetoxin contributed to the die-off in general, but we don't know specifically how it contributed.
One other side note: even if we could connect brevetoxin to liver and immune damage, the author only says in the passage that brevetoxin "may" have been a factor. That wouldn't give us the kind of support we would need to make the stronger claim in answer choice C that brevetoxin "damages" (100% certainly) the liver and immune system.
I hope this helps!
Jeremy
Jeremy Press
LSAT Instructor and law school admissions consultant
Follow me on Twitter at:
https://twitter.com/JeremyLSAT