#21 - Jane: Professor Harper's ideas for modifying the

[Dave Killoran]

I thought A says, " no value because there is no general agreement" meaning, there should be general agreement for it to have value?? Am I interpreting it wrong? I feel like it can be interpreted as "there is no general agreement however there should be general agreement for it to have value" ? please help

I'm not sure I'm 100% following what you mean here. That said, do we know that Jane's argument has a weakness? No. Second, Jane doesn't even think that general agreement exists so Mark's comment isn't showing how something in her argument can be overcome. And third, since Mark missed Jane's point entirely, it's actually likely that he didn't see a weakness at all in what she said (since he starts out by agreeing with her). For all those reasons, (A) is doesn't describe the method here.

Thanks!