LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 ashpine17
  • Posts: 331
  • Joined: Apr 06, 2021
|
#98962
i thought e was presenting a corelation not causation
User avatar
 ashpine17
  • Posts: 331
  • Joined: Apr 06, 2021
|
#98978
ughh i thought e was just a correlation though.
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1819
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#99420
ashpine17,

Correlation is evidence of causation. Undermining a correlation will undermine a cause-and-effect argument.: ttps://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/lr_causal-reasoning
A correlation alone does not prove a causal relationship, but it can suggest that a causal relationship does, in fact, exist.
This is the idea behind weakening a cause-and-effect argument by showing that the cause can exist without the effect, or the effect without the cause. This is showing a lack of correlation. That undermines the causal argument.

Robert Carroll

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.