LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 izzy_tingles
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: May 21, 2024
|
#107367
Could we use diagramming to get to the correct answer? For instance I'm thinking of the three valid some/most inferences, where one inference is:
Premise: A :arrow: B
Premise: A :arrow: C
Inference: B :some: C

So, in this case, it would be:
H = happiness, AC = approval of one's character, MV = morally virtuous life
Premise: H :arrow: AC
Premise: H :arrow: MV
Inference: AC :some: MV

This inference would match B? I know this isn't an exact match, but I wonder if this principle is correct. Thank you!
 Rachael Wilkenfeld
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1419
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2011
|
#107527
Hi Izzy,

I think you are trying to push for conditional reasoning where it really isn't. You could say the good life :arrow: morally virtuous. That doesn't really help us get to the right answer. The other phrasing is less than conditional, using words like "tends to" in order to link concepts. A conditional statement has to be a very strong relationship. If you know the sufficient is true, you know the necessary is true EVERY time. Anything less is not conditional, and cannot be diagrammed with the all arrow.

Hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.