LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 jjplane1117
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Nov 05, 2023
|
#103911
Im not sure if you exactly answered this question but why is it that rule 1 is the biconditional logic and rule 2 is just the simple conditional logic. What makes them different?

when i was taking this (and similar games like this) i find it difficult to know when a rule is biconditional and when it is simple. Thank you!
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 927
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#103926
Hi jjplane1117!

The short answer is: if you encounter the language "if and only if" (or "if but only if"), then you know you're dealing with a biconditional statement. If it just says "if," then it's a normal conditional statement.

Notice here that the first rule uses "if but only if" language. The second rule, by contrast, just uses "if." To unpack the biconditional statement, we have "Grace helps move the sofa if, but only if, Heather helps move the recliner." This is saying (1) if Heather helps move the recliner, then Grace helps move the sofa, and (2) Grace helps move the sofa only if Heather helps move the recliner.

If you look back on page one, Steve also provides a useful discussion of biconditional reasoning.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.