- Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:48 pm
#42417
Hi,
For answer choice A, several explanations I've seen say that there is no indication that the parent prohibited the son or daughter from consenting to the transplant. But the father 'strongly objected to transplantation of organs from live donors'. Wouldn't that imply that the father would prohibit her daughter from consenting to the transplant? Is this because of 'would' vs 'did'? Is it the fact that although the father most likely would have prohibited his daughter from consenting, the fact remains that there is no indication he actually did prohibit her?
For answer choice A, several explanations I've seen say that there is no indication that the parent prohibited the son or daughter from consenting to the transplant. But the father 'strongly objected to transplantation of organs from live donors'. Wouldn't that imply that the father would prohibit her daughter from consenting to the transplant? Is this because of 'would' vs 'did'? Is it the fact that although the father most likely would have prohibited his daughter from consenting, the fact remains that there is no indication he actually did prohibit her?