- Mon Aug 31, 2020 1:02 pm
#78598
Dear David M. Killoran,
I pray this meets you well.
Firstly I have to start by thanking you very much for the Study-Plan you guys created on this Powerscore, it is indeed a Power-Plan and I am grateful.
I have been enjoying my study at least I can say, so far so good. However, under (3.) Sequencing Rules: the diagramming on pages 58, 59, 60 and 61 are not quite clear to me: "why is G under 1 and the other G is under 6? How the Not Laws came under the numbers that they did is what my primary confusion is about.
Secondly on Page 60, the rule is diagrammed as [FG] ------- I and why not I ----- [FG] ?
These are my questions. Thank you for your time and I cannot wait for your response.
I pray this meets you well.
Firstly I have to start by thanking you very much for the Study-Plan you guys created on this Powerscore, it is indeed a Power-Plan and I am grateful.
I have been enjoying my study at least I can say, so far so good. However, under (3.) Sequencing Rules: the diagramming on pages 58, 59, 60 and 61 are not quite clear to me: "why is G under 1 and the other G is under 6? How the Not Laws came under the numbers that they did is what my primary confusion is about.
Secondly on Page 60, the rule is diagrammed as [FG] ------- I and why not I ----- [FG] ?
These are my questions. Thank you for your time and I cannot wait for your response.