- Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:40 pm
#8878
Question number 3 I had originally selected C. While I see how the answer is A and that makes sense to me....wouldn't L being 6 make M automatically 3rd?
I understand nothing can come after L if it is last then it could violate the L>O rule...
from my understanding is I am taking the wrong rule and applying it. but then again if L is last then M must be 3rd? which would negate the other rule entirely not having to worry about L>O.
I understand nothing can come after L if it is last then it could violate the L>O rule...
from my understanding is I am taking the wrong rule and applying it. but then again if L is last then M must be 3rd? which would negate the other rule entirely not having to worry about L>O.