LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

Homework or Lesson help relating to our Accelerated or Live Online Accelerated Courses.
 saranash1
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: May 21, 2013
|
#10830
I don't understand how answer A cast doubt on Passage B or bolsters the argument in passage a? The human population is not discussed in either passage. How is it relevant?
 Ron Gore
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 220
  • Joined: May 15, 2013
|
#10835
Hi saranash1.

Answer (A) does not refer specifically to human population, but rather populations of species generally. Author A talked about the threat to various species beginning in line 10. Author B largely dismissed this information, stating that for the most part, "none of the species highlighted..can be considered threatened in North America." Choice (A) supports Author (A) by stating that even if the threat to species is a localized problem now, such population reduction is often a precursor to widespread endangerment. This answer undermines Author (B), because its information shows that the kind of localized population issues he dismisses is often a precursor to the widespread endangerment he implies would be a problem.

Thanks,

Ron
 saranash1
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: May 21, 2013
|
#10909
That makes sense. Thanks

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.