Is it helpful to record different types of Methods of Reasoning used on the exam?

[lounalola]

So in the study bible, it says to keep a list of the different methods of reasoning used in these problems. Has anyone tried this? How did you do it and did it help? Also, did you do this for the Method-AP answers or just the Method of Reasoning answers?

Thanks

[Jeff Wren]

Hi lounalola,

While your question appears to be addressed to other students (and hopefully other students will comment on their experiences), I'll briefly add my two cents.

Knowing the LSAT's descriptions for different types of reasoning is helpful not just for other Method questions and Flaw questions but also understanding arguments throughout the LR section. Keeping a list is one good way to study these answers.

One option would be to type the answers into a spreadsheet. Another option would be to write them down in a notebook or on flash cards. (For some people, the actual act of writing by hand helps with memorizing/internalizing the ideas more so than typing.)

Because Method-AP answers are describing specific parts of individual arguments rather than the underlying reason itself (like regular Method questions), I don't necessarily think keeping a list of these answers is helpful in the same way. However, you do want to familiarize yourself with different ways that the test makers may describe certain parts of the argument, such as the various ways the LSAT can describe an intermediate conclusion (subsidiary, secondary, supporting, etc.) or how the LSAT might describe a premise using the word "evidence."