LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 saranash1
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: May 21, 2013
|
#11706
Please tell me if this logic is accurate:


Strengthen question answers don't necessarily have to specifically address what was explicitly stated in the conclusion.
Instead, the answer can strengthen a premise, which also supports the conclusion.

This also applies in weaken questions.

Doesn't necessarily have to weaken whats explicitly stated in the conclusion. But instead, can weaken a premise, which also strengthens the conclusion.
 Jon Denning
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 907
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#11709
Hey Sara - that logic works, but it's applicability is obviously going to be contextual. Some premises are given as fact and thus can't really be strengthened or weakened, in which case you'll be supporting or attacking the connections the author makes/the conclusion the author draws. But others are more uncertain and thus can be affected more directly.
 David Boyle
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 836
  • Joined: Jun 07, 2013
|
#11713
saranash1 wrote:Please tell me if this logic is accurate:


Strengthen question answers don't necessarily have to specifically address what was explicitly stated in the conclusion.
Instead, the answer can strengthen a premise, which also supports the conclusion.

This also applies in weaken questions.

Doesn't necessarily have to weaken whats explicitly stated in the conclusion. But instead, can weaken a premise, which also strengthens the conclusion.
Hello,

Yes, this is possible, though the conclusion is often focused on. --As you were saying, a premise can be strengthened; e.g., if a premise is, "There was testing that supports people liking jelly beans as their favorite food", a strengthener could be, "The testing comprised 20 well-funded, well-run tests taken recently and with a pool of over 1000 people in each test." That would seem to strengthen the premise.

Direct weakening of premises may be rarer, though: that would make it too easy for you. E.g., premise is "Everybody loves cotton candy", and an answer choice is, "Uh, NOBODY loves cotton candy." So, focus will often be on the conclusion.

David

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.