LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 rameday
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: May 07, 2014
|
#15313
Hello,

So I just had a question. I tend to sometimes view conditional reasons from a causality perspective. So instead of suff :arrow: nec i think cause :arrow: effect.

So for example with weaken questions that have elements of conditionality I know that I have to show that the necessary condition is not necessary for the suff. to occur. Isn't that similar to causality -- cause without effect and can I conceptualize it like that since I find causality a more straightforward concept than conditionality?

Also with weaken questions with conditional reasoning do I need to even worry about the contrapositive? I have the habit of always doing that but does the CP ever come into play with regards to the answers?

Finally just to clarify a MR and a MN do not undermine the conclusion? I have that in my notes here and i remember seeing something like that in our lesson books but I just want to make sure I wasn't mistaken.

A
 Ron Gore
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 220
  • Joined: May 15, 2013
|
#15317
Hi Rameday,

You ask:
rameday wrote:So for example with weaken questions that have elements of conditionality I know that I have to show that the necessary condition is not necessary for the suff. to occur. Isn't that similar to causality -- cause without effect and can I conceptualize it like that since I find causality a more straightforward concept than conditionality?
It's best not to conflate causality and conditionality, whether you do so knowingly or not. I find that only leads to confusion. Better to just remember that you can attack a conditional relationship by showing the necessary condition isn't really necessary.
rameday wrote:Also with weaken questions with conditional reasoning do I need to even worry about the contrapositive? I have the habit of always doing that but does the CP ever come into play with regards to the answers?
It is not always necessary to diagram the contrapositive, and I would not simply diagram it automatically for each question. That is a big time waster that you can avoid. [as an aside, Dave wrote a great piece on our blog about deciding when to diagram and when not to diagram] However, I would always keep in mind that the original conditional statement and the contrapositive are logically identical, and that a weaken question could certain attack from the perspective of the contrapositive.

Thanks,

Ron

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.