LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 Basia W
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: Jun 19, 2014
|
#16164
Hello,

I am trying to remember- how should one approach a weaken question that contains sufficient and necessary indicators? Do we show that the necessary condition does not necessarily follow? I know that weaken stems often deal more with causality.

Thank you for the refresher,

best.

Basia
 Jon Denning
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 907
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#16166
Hey Basia,

To weaken conditional reasoning you simply show that the sufficient doesn't actually depend on the necessary. So to weaken "if A then B" we'd just show A without B, meaning B isn't really required and the argument is incorrect.

I hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.