- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 5972
- Joined: Mar 25, 2011
- Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:31 pm
#94660
Setup and Rule Diagram Explanation
This is a Grouping: Partially Defined, Numerical Distribution game.
The first sentence of the scenario establishes that either 5 or 6 works will be selected:
Because the game is Partially Defined at five or six works selected, the diagram above shows that at least five works must be selected; the bar between the fifth and sixth work indicates that a sixth works can possibly be selected.
The second sentence establishes that the group of nine works is composed of French and Russian novels and plays. As each work has two characteristics, one method is to show them in a vertical format:
Thus, our diagram should also have two rows, one for the nationality and one for the type of work:
The first three rules each address a numerical aspect of the game. The first rule indicates that at most four French works are selected, meaning that at least one Russian work is selected. The combination of the second and third rules creates four basic Numerical Distributions for FN and RN:
Other seemingly possible numerical combinations of FN and RN, such as 3-2 or 3-3, are impossible because the maximum number of novels is 4. Combinations such as 1-0, 1-1, and 2-0 are impossible because they would cause fewer than five total works to be selected.
These four distributions indicate that at least two FNs must always be selected. Also, since the maximum number of novels is four, at least one P must always be selected. The two FNs can easily be shown on the diagram, and then the choice is yours as to show the minimum one P or the minimum one R. Here is the diagram with both FNs, the minimum of three Ns, and one P:
The four FN/RN distributions have a powerful effect on the questions. For example, on question #8, the distributions show that answer choice (A) could be true and is therefore correct. On question #10, the distributions prove that answer choice (D) is correct. The distribution even has an impact on question #11 as it shows that answer choice (A) is impossible: if no RNs are selected, the maximum number of FN’s selected is three, and three FNs plus exactly one P equals four total works, one less than the required minimum.
The last rule of the game states that if both FPs are selected, then no RP is selected. But, because at least one R work must be selected, if both FPs are selected then at least one RN is selected:
Consequently, at most two plays can be selected, which corresponds to the second rule that at least three novels are always selected.
Overall, the rules in the game are not precise, and thus they are not easy to display conventionally. This situation gives the game a piecemeal or random feel. However, if you can focus on the rules involving numbers and thereby create the FN/RN distribution, this game is not difficult. Here is the final diagram for this game:
This is a Grouping: Partially Defined, Numerical Distribution game.
The first sentence of the scenario establishes that either 5 or 6 works will be selected:
Because the game is Partially Defined at five or six works selected, the diagram above shows that at least five works must be selected; the bar between the fifth and sixth work indicates that a sixth works can possibly be selected.
The second sentence establishes that the group of nine works is composed of French and Russian novels and plays. As each work has two characteristics, one method is to show them in a vertical format:
Thus, our diagram should also have two rows, one for the nationality and one for the type of work:
The first three rules each address a numerical aspect of the game. The first rule indicates that at most four French works are selected, meaning that at least one Russian work is selected. The combination of the second and third rules creates four basic Numerical Distributions for FN and RN:
Other seemingly possible numerical combinations of FN and RN, such as 3-2 or 3-3, are impossible because the maximum number of novels is 4. Combinations such as 1-0, 1-1, and 2-0 are impossible because they would cause fewer than five total works to be selected.
These four distributions indicate that at least two FNs must always be selected. Also, since the maximum number of novels is four, at least one P must always be selected. The two FNs can easily be shown on the diagram, and then the choice is yours as to show the minimum one P or the minimum one R. Here is the diagram with both FNs, the minimum of three Ns, and one P:
The four FN/RN distributions have a powerful effect on the questions. For example, on question #8, the distributions show that answer choice (A) could be true and is therefore correct. On question #10, the distributions prove that answer choice (D) is correct. The distribution even has an impact on question #11 as it shows that answer choice (A) is impossible: if no RNs are selected, the maximum number of FN’s selected is three, and three FNs plus exactly one P equals four total works, one less than the required minimum.
The last rule of the game states that if both FPs are selected, then no RP is selected. But, because at least one R work must be selected, if both FPs are selected then at least one RN is selected:
Consequently, at most two plays can be selected, which corresponds to the second rule that at least three novels are always selected.
Overall, the rules in the game are not precise, and thus they are not easy to display conventionally. This situation gives the game a piecemeal or random feel. However, if you can focus on the rules involving numbers and thereby create the FN/RN distribution, this game is not difficult. Here is the final diagram for this game:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dave Killoran
PowerScore Test Preparation
Follow me on X/Twitter at http://twitter.com/DaveKilloran
My LSAT Articles: http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/author/dave-killoran
PowerScore Podcast: http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/podcast/
PowerScore Test Preparation
Follow me on X/Twitter at http://twitter.com/DaveKilloran
My LSAT Articles: http://blog.powerscore.com/lsat/author/dave-killoran
PowerScore Podcast: http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/podcast/