2nd/3rd level inferences

[mford]

I was in my tutoring session today and I realized that my tutor is able to recognize the higher level inferences on the basis of the structure of the question or the type of diagram that results. How do I get to a level where I can say something like "yea 2 into three, that equates to a potential hurdle the uncertainty, look for limitation rules which force two of the three variables to be used." I guess what I'm saying is how can you "see" these things? Tons of practice or just a mathematical mind?

[Nikki Siclunov]

In some ways, your tutor answered your question: look for limitation rules, such as a rule that forces two of the three variables to be used. But in general, after enough practice and guidance you will learn to recognize the powerful rules that drive the solution of your game. It is important not to get "bogged down" in the minutiae and read through the game scenario and rules before setting it up. Analyze the different rules and figure out which ones would affect all the variables in the game (e.g. numerical distribution rules). Or, if you see a rule that outlines two separate but exhaustive solutions (e.g. either A is before B, or else B is before A, but not both) analyze each solution carefully and decide if it is limited enough to pursue a templates approach.

It does take awhile to "see" these things quickly, which is why you have a tutor and access to some of the best LSAT resources in the history of the test.

Good luck!