- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Dec 06, 2013
- Sat Mar 18, 2023 5:35 pm
#100483
PresidentLSAT,
To say that increased interaction between heavy machinery and unprotected workers can (not even will, just can) lead to increased injuries is completely common sense. For a Weaken answer choice, that seems straightforwardly to be an entirely plausible gloss on what answer choice (A) is saying. Can you give me an example of a situation where such an assumption wasn't allowed and would make an equivalent answer wrong?
Robert Carroll
To say that increased interaction between heavy machinery and unprotected workers can (not even will, just can) lead to increased injuries is completely common sense. For a Weaken answer choice, that seems straightforwardly to be an entirely plausible gloss on what answer choice (A) is saying. Can you give me an example of a situation where such an assumption wasn't allowed and would make an equivalent answer wrong?
Robert Carroll