LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#101547
Complete Question Explanation

Strengthen, Cause and Effect. The correct answer choice is (B).

This is a good example of how the last question in a section isn't automatically a difficult question.

The stimulus opens by providing the facts that prior to 2900 BC wheat was cultivated in large quantities but after 2900BC it began to decline as the production of barley rose. It might be easy to jump the conclusion that the rise in barley was the cause of the wheat decline, but you shouldn't do that and neither does the stimulus. Instead the author cites historians who believe there was a different set of related causes for the decline in wheat production: excessive irrigation, lack of drainage, and ultimately the accumulation of salt in soil. No further evidence or support is provided for their view, and thus it is no surprise when the question stem asks you to focus on this statement, and find an answer that supports it.


Answer choice (A): This answer certainly would provide some explanation for why barley production increased, but does it support the historians' explanation? No, there's no mention of the overirrigation/drainage/salt cycle they cited, and we can't assume this answer supports that explanation.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. This answer helps support the idea that the cause cited would allow for the wheat decline and the barley increase. On a more abstract level, salt was the key to the historians' explanation, and you'd have to expect the correct answer would in some way support or address the salt issue.

Answer choice (C): This answer is in harmony with the idea that wheat was more widely produced prior to 2900 BC, but it does not address why that ratio suddenly flipped around 2900 BC. In other words, it doesn't address or support the historians' view.

Answer choice (D): This answer provides an explanation for why the wheat production dropped, but it does not explain why barley suddenly replaced wheat.

Answer choice (E): This addresses an expected effect of barley production increasing, but it does not address whether the historians' explanation of salt concentration is viable.
User avatar
 rlouis1993
  • Posts: 15
  • Joined: Jun 09, 2023
|
#102327
Did you all ever get around to an explanation?
User avatar
 sxzhao
  • Posts: 26
  • Joined: Jul 02, 2024
|
#107802
I understand how B appears as the winner as compared to other choices, but I was still hesitant, because

the historian's contention is: wheat decline was due to excessive irrigation, lack of drainage, salty soil etc. - i.e., the historian's contention concerns the REASON for wheat's decline. In my head, I was making the prediction that to strengthen the argument, one will have to show that people then didn't give up wheat for some other reasons, like voluntarily switched to barley becasye wheat as a crop wasn't as productive as barley

choice (b), by showing barley could thrive in salty soil, provides for evidence that "yes indeed the soil was salty", but to me it simply repeats part of the contention already mentioned without strengthening the causal relations

Is there any material I could refer to to educate myself on WHAT to strengthen when asked to strengthen an argument?
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 927
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#107933
Hi sxzhao!

You ask,

Is there any material I could refer to to educate myself on WHAT to strengthen when asked to strengthen an argument?
In general, it's the conclusion of the argument that one must strengthen on strengthen questions. It's thus imperative to make sure that you've correctly identified the conclusion in a given stimulus. Here, it's the final sentence: "Some historians who study ancient Mesopotamia contend that the decline in wheat production was due to excessive irrigation, lack of drainage, and the consequent accumulation of salt residues in the soil."

To your question about materials you could refer to, if you have PowerScore's course books, I'd recommend taking a look at lesson 4. That lesson covers strengthen questions. It also goes in depth into causal reasoning in strengthen questions--for example, one can strengthen causal reasoning by showing when the cause occurs, the effect is always present, or one can show that it's not the case that causal relationship is in fact reversed, etc.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.