LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Poonam Agrawal
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: Apr 23, 2021
|
#88213
Hi Mahmed!

Thanks for your question - this one is definitely a tricky one to diagram. Here's how I would proceed, given the way you have started the diagram:

DP = Large number of demerit points
CS = Convicted of a serious driving related offense
J = Jail
R = Reeducation
LBR = Likely to become a responsible driver (added this one to your original key)

Sentence 1: DP & CS :arrow: J or R
Sentence 2: R :arrow: LBR (the "only if" creates this relationship)
Sentence 3: DP :arrow: LBR
Then, consider the contrapositive of sentence 2:

LBR :arrow: R
Which leads us to the following relationships:

DP :arrow: LBR :arrow: R
DP & SO :arrow: J (is the only option left)
So, back to your original question - you don't necessarily need to look at the contrapositive of the first sentence. It is more helpful to consider all three sentences and figure out which contrapositives (in our case, the one from sentence 2) will lead you to a correct answer choice.

Hope that helps! Let me know if there's any part in the diagramming that is unclear.
User avatar
 jmulder615
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: Jan 10, 2023
|
#102224
It's crazy how this entire question hinges on the reader recognizing that it says "such drivers", which refers to the entire group, instead of saying it should be addressed case-by-case. The entire group is almost never going to be made more responsible which essentially disqualifies the possibility of re-education.
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 930
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#102274
Hi jmulder615!

You're right to be on guard for words like "such drivers." Similarly, it's important to be aware of demonstratives like "these" and "those." If there's any confusion, it can be helpful to circle a word like that and draw it back to whatever subject is being referenced from a previous sentence or clause.

The stimulus in this question is saying that one of two options should occur--either re-education or jail time. The stimulus then concludes that re-education is not a viable option (it should only be an option if it makes "such drivers" more responsible, but it won't make them more responsible). This leaves jail as the remaining option.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.