- Thu Aug 20, 2020 8:05 pm
#78266
Happy to help, Boomer! The problem with B isn't about high vs rich. The problem is that it tells us nothing about comparing those who eat nuts to those who do not eat them. The paradox is that nut eaters are less likely to be overweight than those who don't eat them, even though nuts are high in calories and eating more calories tends to cause people to be overweight.
To resolve this paradox, you need to see what makes nut eaters so darn special! What sets them apart from others? What are they doing to counteract the effect of eating high calorie nuts? Only answer E gives us something to set them apart - nuts don't make you feel hungry, but other foods do. So it seems reasonable then that people who are NOT eating nuts are more likely to eat things that make them want to eat even more, making those people more likely to eat more and become overweight.
In short, B tells us nothing about how nut eaters are special or different. It does not make us go "oh, okay, so THAT's why they aren't overweight!"
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam