LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8948
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#31756
Please post below with any questions!
User avatar
 MountainGirl234
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: Mar 24, 2021
|
#88236
Hi there,

I want to ensure that I know why B is incorrect.

Is it incorrect because we don't know where Jackson stands on the use of bicycles in the hypocrisy involving pollution?
 Robert Carroll
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1819
  • Joined: Dec 06, 2013
|
#88243
Mountain,

Answer choice (B) is incorrect because both of the authors agree that speaking out against gas-guzzlers when still driving (when one could use a bike) is hypocritical. Peraski's last sentence shows that Peraski believes that to be hypocritical, and Jackson seems to acknowledge that such is hypocritical as well ("just because I am being hypocritical").

Robert Carroll
User avatar
 bjohnson2021
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: Jul 03, 2023
|
#102322
I was stuck between B and D and I ended up choosing B. I tend to pick the incorrect answer that is an overgeneralization, so even though I wanted to pick D, I chose B because I thought D was an overgeneralization. They both acknowledge that they are being hypocritical but they are arguing over whether or not they should still be allowed to speak out since they are hypocrites (unless I am understanding the stimulus incorrectly). So how is D not an overgeneralization?
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 930
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#102337
Hi bjohnson2021!

Especially if you've narrowed it down to just two answer choices, for a point at issue question like this one, it can be useful to put an initial for each speaker next to the answer choice under consideration. Then, ask whether the speaker would agree with or disagree with the statement, or write down a question mark if it's unclear whether the speaker would agree or disagree. In this particular question, we're asked for a point of disagreement.

Answer choice (D) states, "one should speak out against polluting even if doing so reveals one’s own hypocrisy." We can note the views of each speaker on this:

P: Disagree
J: Agree
This confirms that this is a point of disagreement with them, and thus the correct answer choice. P would disagree with (D) (P concludes that we "cannot speak out ... We would be revealing our hypocrisy). J would agree with the statement (J concludes that "it would be worse not to speak out ... just because I am being hypocritical").

By contrast, answer choice (B) states, "speaking out against the use of gas guzzlers despite driving in situations in which one could use a bicycle reveals hypocrisy." Asking whether the speakers agree or disagree, we'd have:

P: Agree
J: Agree
P would agree with this statement ("We would be revealing our hypocrisy"). J would also agree with this statement ("just because I am being hypocritical"). Since they'd both agree, (B) is not a point of disagreement and thus not the correct answer choice.
User avatar
 bjohnson2021
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: Jul 03, 2023
|
#102338
Thank you so much! That was very helpful. This question has been bothering me for days

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.