- Mon Jan 24, 2022 1:10 pm
#93474
I see two problems with answer B, jonwchalmers99, and the first has already been pointed out here. Cezanne inspired artists who did abstract art, but that is not proof that Cezanne's art was itself abstract. Perhaps there was something else about his work that later abstract artists found inspiring such as his brushwork or his use of light and shadows? And remember that some critics disagree with his role in inspiring Modernism, so if they are correct then perhaps his work had nothing to do with Modernism and wasn't abstract at all!
But also, there is no evidence that Cezanne was an "early" creator of abstract art, even if he did work in an abstract style. Perhaps there had been abstract art of one sort or another for a thousand years before he came along? His work inspired the Modernists, who did abstract work, so he must have been "earlier" than those Modernists artists, but that doesn't mean his abstract work was "early." That's what we call a "Relativity Flaw," like saying "my son is older than my daughter, so my son must be old."
But also, there is no evidence that Cezanne was an "early" creator of abstract art, even if he did work in an abstract style. Perhaps there had been abstract art of one sort or another for a thousand years before he came along? His work inspired the Modernists, who did abstract work, so he must have been "earlier" than those Modernists artists, but that doesn't mean his abstract work was "early." That's what we call a "Relativity Flaw," like saying "my son is older than my daughter, so my son must be old."
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/LSATadam