LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#24911
Complete Question Explanation

Main Point—FIB, CE. The correct answer choice is (E)

This stimulus provides facts in the first two sentences, and then asks you to complete the third
sentence. The facts relate to the effect of testosterone on brain cells. Apparently, testosterone protects
brain cells from injury, while also reducing the levels of the protein beta-amyloid in the brain. This
information suggests a link between testosterone and Alzheimer’s disease, because beta-amyloid
causally contributes to Alzheimer’s disease, and people whose brain cells are susceptible to injury
are probably more susceptible to Alzheimer’s disease.

The question stem identifies this as a Main Point—Fill in the Blank question. Looking back to the
stimulus, the conservative beginning to the conclusion, “so there is reason to think that...,” telegraphs
that the conclusion will be fairly weak, rather than being definitive. Our prephrase is that the facts in
the stimulus connect testosterone levels to Alzheimer’s disease, in that people who lack testosterone
will be at greater risk for Alzheimer’s disease, because they will be more prone to brain injury, and
will have higher beta-amyloid levels.

Answer choice (A): The stimulus told us that those whose brain cells are susceptible to injury are
probably more susceptible to Alzheimer’s. This answer choice exaggerates that risk by stating
definitively that if a person’s brain cells are susceptible to injury then they will develop Alzheimer’s
disease.

Answer choice (B): We know from the stimulus that beta-amyloid contributes to Alzheimer’s
disease. This answer choice goes too far by treating beta-amyloid levels as the sole cause of
Alzheimer’s disease.

Answer choice (C): The facts established that low testosterone levels can create a greater risk for
Alzheimer’s disease. This answer choice reverses that relationship, by saying Alzheimer’s disease
causes a reduction in testosterone levels.

Answer choice (D): The stimulus told us that increased susceptibility to brain injury is a risk factor
for Alzheimer’s disease. This answer choice both reverses that relationship and exaggerates it, saying
that Alzheimer’s disease is necessary for being at risk for brain cell injury.

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice, because a decrease in the testosterone
level decreases the protection of brain cells from injury, which probably increases susceptibility to
Alzheimer’s disease. Also, the reduction in testosterone could impede the reduction of the protein
beta-amyloid, a causal contributor to Alzheimer’s disease.
User avatar
 JNSIWL24
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: May 10, 2023
|
#105955
Hi,
I answered this question in a practice test correctly, but still want to confirm my understanding of the general way to attack Main Point Qs. The main approach is to find the main conclusion in the stimulus and pick an answer choice that is a rephrase of the main conclusion. In this problem, there is a twist! We have to FIB and pick the ans. that completes the conclusion. This question seems like a modified version of a MAIN POINT Q. Please let me know whether or not my overall understanding is correct. Thanks.
User avatar
 JNSIWL24
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: May 10, 2023
|
#105956
Hi,
I tried to diagram:

T——-> protect injury +reduce protein beta-amyloid

Cause Effect
protein beta-amyloid——>Alz. disease
—————————————————————————————-
C: So…..


Is it useful to diagram this type of problem: MAIN POINT FIB, in order to check one’s answer?
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 927
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#105990
Hi JNSIWL24!

In this problem, there is a twist! We have to FIB and pick the ans. that completes the conclusion. This question seems like a modified version of a MAIN POINT Q.
Yes, your reasoning sounds correct. In general, main point questions are a subcategory of must be true questions, and must be true questions occasionally are in a fill-in-the-blank format. So in some sense it's a twist, but I'd more just say it's uncommon though not rare on the test. Filling in the blank will almost certainly test one's ability to make inferences based off of what is in the stimulus, which is a staple thing that is tested through must be true questions. Often what one infers is the conclusion of the argument.

T——-> protect injury +reduce protein beta-amyloid

Cause Effect
protein beta-amyloid——>Alz. disease
—————————————————————————————-
C: So…..

Is it useful to diagram this type of problem: MAIN POINT FIB, in order to check one’s answer?
Regarding your diagram in particular, yes that seems to reflect accurately what is in the stimulus. The first diagram captures the first sentence (which I'd note is also a cause and effect relationship). The second diagram denotes the causal relationship in the first half of the second sentence.

In terms of more general testing strategy, yes, quickly jotting down a diagram of conditional reasoning and cause and effect relationships is a very useful tool. You obviously don't want to spend too much time diagramming, but it can be a quick way to distill what is in the stimulus that lets you visualize conditional reasoning clearly. More than that, it can also make it easier to help you spot inferences that can be made based on any given conditional reasoning in the stimulus.
User avatar
 JNSIWL24
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: May 10, 2023
|
#106014
Thanks Luke for your helpful and quick response! I will press forward!!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.