- Posts: 1
- Joined: May 11, 2024
- Sat May 11, 2024 12:11 pm
#106412
Hello!
I am really struggling on LR flaw q's when there is a mistaken negation or mistaken reversal. The structure of the answer "takes a sufficient cond as a necessary one" and "takes a necessary cond as a sufficient one" always scramble my brain and I end up psyching myself out on the answer. Can someone explain all the ways that a mistaken reversal or negation can be presented in the answer choices?
I am able to spot when there is mistaken negation or reversal in the stimulus, but I am taking way too long to find the right answer from there.
I saw a post that said that mistaken negation is "takes a sufficient cond as a necessary one" and mistaken reversal is "takes a necessary cond for a sufficient cond" so I think I'm just going to memorize that, but please let me know if theres a better strategy or other ways mistaken negation or reversals are described on the test.
Thanks!
I am really struggling on LR flaw q's when there is a mistaken negation or mistaken reversal. The structure of the answer "takes a sufficient cond as a necessary one" and "takes a necessary cond as a sufficient one" always scramble my brain and I end up psyching myself out on the answer. Can someone explain all the ways that a mistaken reversal or negation can be presented in the answer choices?
I am able to spot when there is mistaken negation or reversal in the stimulus, but I am taking way too long to find the right answer from there.
I saw a post that said that mistaken negation is "takes a sufficient cond as a necessary one" and mistaken reversal is "takes a necessary cond for a sufficient cond" so I think I'm just going to memorize that, but please let me know if theres a better strategy or other ways mistaken negation or reversals are described on the test.
Thanks!