LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#36388
Complete Question Explanation

Must Be True—Principle. The correct answer choice is (B)

The factory spokesperson argues that the factory should not be required to clean up the pollution
caused by its wastewater because the real offender is the contractor who disposes of the factory’s
wastewater.

Although the argument contains fl aws (for example, couldn’t the factory have selected a more
environmentally conscious contractor?), the question asks you to select a response based on the same
principle, so you must seek the answer choice that best refl ects the reasoning in the stimulus.

A principle is a broad rule that specifi es what actions or judgments are correct in a certain situation,
but a principle does not have to be stated in logical terms, just terms that make sense to you. One
way to state the principle in this problem would be, “we are not to blame since we didn’t actually do
it,” or, perhaps more succinctly, as “let’s pass the buck.”

Answer choice (A): This response implies that parents have a responsibility or interest, which is an
idea contrary to the reasoning in the stimulus.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. Similar to the stimulus, this response is
broadly based on the principle that people should not be held responsible for the independent actions
of others. This response also contains a similar type of fl aw as the stimulus: just as the factory could
have selected a more responsible contractor or taken action to insist on proper disposal, a parent of
an adolescent has had infl uence over the formation of that individual and can take action to insist on
proper behavior.

Answer choice (C): This response attempts to absolve students of a responsibility; however, it
contains no separation between a responsible party and the students. The process of blaming
someone else was a critical part of the principle, so this response is unsatisfactory.

Answer choice (D): Does this answer choice fi t the principle of, “we are not to blame since we didn’t
actually do it?” No, this response merely limits someone’s activity.

Answer choice (E): This response is not at all related to the principle that one not be blamed for
another’s actions. Instead, this answer seems to better characterize a principle such as, “when there is
evidence to the contrary, I will be skeptical.”
 Cflores17
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: Aug 22, 2024
|
#109157
What would be the name of the flaw?
 Luke Haqq
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 927
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2012
|
#109692
Hi Cflores17!

Looking at the list of flaws that PowerScore includes in Lesson 7, it's not clear that the way in which this stimulus is flawed falls neatly into one of those categories. Remember that the list of flaws provided there (which it's invaluable to be well-acquainted with) are the most common types of flaws you'll see on the LSAT but doesn't exhaustively cover every type of flaw you'll see. There are many that may appear on the test that don't fall into those categories.

Nevertheless, one could argue that this could fall into the "general lack of relevant evidence for the conclusion" category. As the administrator asks, couldn't the factory have selected a better contractor? The author doesn't cite enough evidence to support the conclusion that the factory is not at all to blame.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.