LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#92709
Complete Question Explanation

The correct answer choice is (E).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B):

Answer choice (C):

Answer choice (D):

Answer choice (E): This is the correct answer choice.


This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 P. Boy
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: Aug 21, 2021
|
#89911
Hello
Why is D not the answer to this....
I was left with E & D and ended up choosing D
User avatar
 Beatrice Brown
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: Jun 30, 2021
|
#89944
Hi P.! Happy to help you out with this :)

For a parallel question on Reading Comprehension, the correct answer choice will be the one that most directly mirrors either the concept referred to in the question or the structure of the passage. In this case, the question asks us to find the answer choice that best parallels a concept: the research described in the passage on peptides.

First, let's summarize the research on peptides: Belcher (one of the researchers) had conducted research on abaolones that discovered a crystallization property of a certain peptide. Belcher and Hu then applied this finding to semiconductor materials and building nanoscale electronics, and since there was no known peptide to accomplish this purpose of crystal growth, they grew and tested one billion different peptides with three semiconductor materials. Once they determined the characteristics that may contribute to the peptide's ability to bind to the crystals, they created additional peptides.

Let's now abstract the aspects of the research that need to be paralleled to the case of volatile oils in the answer choice:
1. Research conducted in a different field with applications to the field of interest
2. Creating/synthesizing other similar materials (in the passage, peptides, and in the answer choice, volatile oils) based off of the original findings to see how they apply to the field of interest
Answer choice (D) starts off strong because it describes a finding in one field of interest (fruit trees) and how it may be applied to another field of interest (human medical applications). However, answer choice (D) is incorrect because this group of researchers does not synthesize similar volatile oils but only examines existing similar oils. In the passage, one critical part of Belcher and Hu's research is that they synthesized new peptides for the new field of interest. Since answer choice (D) does not mention synthesizing new oils, it is incorrect.

Answer choice (E), by contrast, correctly parallels the research described in the passage. First, the group of researchers extrapolate findings from one field (trees and fungal infections) to a new field (human medical applications and antibacterial activity). Second, unlike answer choice (D), the researchers in answer choice (E) synthesize similar oils to apply the research to the new field, as the author described Belcher and Hu doing in the passage.

To sum up, for a parallel question, we want to ensure that all relevant aspects of the concept or passage are mirrored in the answer choice. In this case, answer choice (E) describes a situation that mirrors the important aspects of Belcher and Hu's research, whereas answer choice (D) fails to mirror one important aspect.

I hope this helps, and let me know if you have any other questions!
User avatar
 thomas33
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: Mar 06, 2024
|
#109596
Doesn't Answer Choice C also fit the criteria we are looking for? That being research conducted in a different field applied to a new field of interest and synthesizing materials? Or is C wrong because the researchers stumble into the new application when E) the researchers are more intentional like in the passage?
 Adam Tyson
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5400
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2011
|
#109891
My first problem with answer C, thomas33, is that Belcher and Hu didn't start by synthesizing and combining peptides. They started by observing them in nature, and then they tried to make some alternate use of them. My second problem with that answer is that the combination of peptides didn't come until much later in their process, while answer C has them starting out by combining them for one purpose and then later considering the exact same combination for a different purpose.

I wouldn't say that they stumbled into the new application. They observed this behavior in nature, and then thought about utilizing it in a different way. It was no accident, but very intentional through experimentation.

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.