LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#104151
Complete Question Explanation

Justify the Conclusion. The correct answer choice is (D).

Answer choice (A):

Answer choice (B):

Answer choice (C):

Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice.

Answer choice (E):

This explanation is still in progress. Please post any questions below!
User avatar
 zoezoe6021
  • Posts: 29
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2023
|
#104973
I don't understand why D is correct.

D= renovate this year→/ stay with this year B

Stimulus:
stay with this year B→/ stay within next year B
/renovate this year→renovate next year→/ stay within next year B

If D is correct, then it seems like
A→B
A→C
========
B→C
User avatar
 Jeff Wren
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 657
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2022
|
#105048
Hi Zoe,

The first step to solving this Justify question is correctly identifying the conclusion and the premises of the argument. The conclusion is the first half of the first sentence.

You diagrammed this as:

stay with this year B→/ stay within next year B

One way to identify that this is the conclusion is the word "for" after the comma is a premise indicator, so the clause before the comma is the conclusion.

The other two conditional premises are:

P: /renovate this year→renovate next year
P: renovate next year→/ stay within next year B

You correctly realized that these premises can be linked into a conditional chain.

Our conclusion again is:

C: stay with this year B→/ stay within next year B

Now what we want in our answer is a conditional statement that gets us from the sufficient condition of our conclusion (stay with this year B) all the way to our necessary condition (/ stay within next year B) most likely by linking to our conditional chain in our premises.

A good prephrase for our correct answer would be:

stay with this year B →/renovate this year

Then we'd be able to link everything together:

stay with this year B →/renovate this year →renovate next year→/ stay within next year B

which would allow us to 100% prove our conclusion.

Now the tricky part is that any conditional answer can always be in the form of the contrapositive, which is what Answer D gives us.

renovate this year →/ stay with this year B (i.e. exceeding this year's budget)

is the contrapositive of what we were looking for to link everything together.

If you want to think of this argument using letters, the premises would be:

P: B → C
P: C → D

And our conclusion would be:

C: A → D

So what we need in our correct answer to link everything together is:

A → B
User avatar
 oliviab97
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: Jul 20, 2024
|
#108378
I'm still having trouble with this one - can you please explain why E is wrong?
User avatar
 Jeff Wren
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 657
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2022
|
#108617
Hi olivia,

The short answer is that Answer E is a Mistaken Reversal of what we are looking for.

Using letters to (hopefully) simplify the form of the argument,

We have two premises.

P: B → C
P: C → D

And our conclusion would be:

C: A → D

So what we need in our correct answer to link everything together is:

A → B

In this argument "A" would be "stay within this year's budget" and "B" would be "not renovate this year."

In other words, we're looking for an answer that states,

"If the museum stays within this year's budget, then they will not renovate this year."

This would allow us to link all of the terms together (A to B to C to D) and justify the argument.

Answer E is backwards, stating "if the museum doesn't renovate, then they will stay within this year's budget."

This would be the equivalent to "B -> A" when we need "A -> B."

Answer D however, is the contrapositive of what we are looking for, which is logically equivalent to our prephrase and does justify the argument.
User avatar
 lsatlies
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: Sep 14, 2024
|
#109166
With E, you can link the argument together just fine.
P: museum renovates next year => museum won't make next year's budget
P from E: museum stays within budget this year => it will not renovate this year
P: museum does not renovate this year => museum must renovate next year

C: museum stays within budget this year => museum won't make next year's budget

The premise connects museum stays within budget => won't renovate this year => must renovate next year => will miss next year's budget.
User avatar
 Jeff Wren
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 657
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2022
|
#110295
Hi lsatlies,

Unfortunately, Answer E doesn't say what you think it says.

You have it backwards.

The correct diagram is Not

museum stays within budget this year => it will not renovate this year

as you've diagrammed.

Instead, the correct diagram is

it will not renovate this year => museum stays within budget this year

Notice the word "if" in the middle of the sentence, which is a sufficient indicator, is modifying "not renovate." In other words, the sentence is saying "if it does not renovate this year, then the museum will stay within this year’s budget."

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.