LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

User avatar
 Jeff Wren
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 657
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2022
|
#110466
Hi Dancingbambarina,

I'm not sure that I entirely follow your question.

As far as I can tell, the word "normal" is being used to describe "standard or typical" molecular motion. "Normal" is not referring to the normal amount of molecular motion or to the variability, it is simply referring to the typical molecular motion that happens in the retina.

In the context of the sentence in which it appears, the key distinction is that the change in molecular shape from this normal molecular motion is different from the change in molecular shape that happens when photons hit the rhodopsin molecules and that this change from the normal molecular motion creates visual errors.

The final sentence of the stimulus states that the amount of this normal molecular motion is directly proportional to the temperature of the retina, meaning that as the temperature increases, so does the amount of normal molecular motion.

To solve the question, you simply need to link the temperature to the normal molecular motion and then the motion to the visual errors and find an answer that links these.
User avatar
 Dancingbambarina
  • Posts: 49
  • Joined: Mar 30, 2024
|
#110510
Would you say molecular motion CAUSES Rhodopsin molecules to sometimes change shape? Would the "sometimes" make it a probable cause?
User avatar
 Dave Killoran
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 5972
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2011
|
#110548
They are clearly allowing for different causes. The first line makes it clear that light changes the shape: "Light is registered in the retina when photons hit molecules of the pigment rhodopsin and change the molecules' shape."

Then the second line says that even without light, "rhodopsin molecules sometimes change shape because of normal molecular motion." So yes, the motion is sometimes making it happen as part of the normal course of operations. I don't think to myself this is a "probable" cause because I don't know how often it happens or at what volume--there's no need to classify it as such. I just know it can happen, which is good enough.

Thanks!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.