#15 - Counselor: Hagerle sincerely apologized to the

[Adam Tyson]

You could treat that latter statement as a nested conditional, like so:

Built Badly [Robot Think]

But why make it needlessly complex? It's so much simpler to think of it as just "if a robot is built badly, then it cannot think."

In theory, there could be a nested conditional with more than 3 elements. There have probably been more than a few on the LSAT. Something like:

When you ride a motorcycle, you must wear goggles or a face mask unless you have a full-face helmet or you just don't care whether you live or die.

My first thought when I see something like this isn't to create a complex nested diagram, although I might do so at some point. My first thought is that there's a lot going on, and I'd like to see the question before I take another step. Maybe I can prephrase it without a diagram, or maybe I only need a portion of the diagram? Don't make it harder than it has to be.