- PowerScore Staff
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Apr 26, 2012
- Tue Sep 30, 2025 5:54 pm
#121718
Hi cjtoon!
My best guess is that a scenario like that would be unlikely to happen on the LSAT. It's possible that the LSAT will test you on whether you understand that a subsidiary conclusion can also function as a premise. But you're unlikely to be asked how a specific sentence functions and be given multiple accurate descriptions of it. On any LSAT question, there will only be one correct answer.
My best guess is that a scenario like that would be unlikely to happen on the LSAT. It's possible that the LSAT will test you on whether you understand that a subsidiary conclusion can also function as a premise. But you're unlikely to be asked how a specific sentence functions and be given multiple accurate descriptions of it. On any LSAT question, there will only be one correct answer.