- Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:28 am
#13325
One of the incorrect answers suggested for "point at issue" is "ethical versus factual situations."
Hence, for the ethical stimuli, factual answers must be incorrect automatically.
And, this applies to the question on pg 478 between Shanna and Jorge.
According to the explanation, answer C and E are simply excluded since they are "factual" while the stimuli is "ethical."
My problem is that I cannot draw distinction easily between factual and ethical answers.
It appears to be a huge advantage to recognize what is factual or ethical to reduce time on the test.
Is there more specific criteria or easier way to distinguish factual and ethical answers?
Finally, in the pg 479, it states "will disagree, which is not necessarily the same as identifying the point at issue."
I thought they were the same "point at issue" problem.
The question stems varies with "disagree" or "issue."
Was I supposed to approach these problems differently?
Hence, for the ethical stimuli, factual answers must be incorrect automatically.
And, this applies to the question on pg 478 between Shanna and Jorge.
According to the explanation, answer C and E are simply excluded since they are "factual" while the stimuli is "ethical."
My problem is that I cannot draw distinction easily between factual and ethical answers.
It appears to be a huge advantage to recognize what is factual or ethical to reduce time on the test.
Is there more specific criteria or easier way to distinguish factual and ethical answers?
Finally, in the pg 479, it states "will disagree, which is not necessarily the same as identifying the point at issue."
I thought they were the same "point at issue" problem.
The question stems varies with "disagree" or "issue."
Was I supposed to approach these problems differently?