- Wed Sep 13, 2017 5:24 pm
#39690
They don't have to mention a specific study, brcibake - all they have to do is suggest that such a study or studies may have been done. In other words, all we need to support answer choice C with the text of the passage is any indication that someone, sometime, has looked into the environmental impact of drilling mud discharges.
A couple lines from passage B jump out at me. First, at line 41: "It is not particularly toxic to marine organisms". How would we know that if we hadn't looked into it? Then, around line 52: "OBMs have a greater potential for negative environmental impact." Again, if nobody had studied it, even cursorily, how would we know that? Backtrack a bit to line 33, and you get this: "These discharges are the main environmental concern in offshore oil production." Why would it be a concern if nobody had studied it in any way? Finally, we have this, starting at the end of line 54: "Barite may impact some organisms, particularly scallops, and the mineral oil may have toxic effects." Sounds to me like someone probably studied this. Maybe not - these references could all just be guesses on the part of the author - but it does at least suggest that some study has been done.
We don't need a particular study, nor does that study have to be done by scientists or published in a journal. All we need to eliminate C is some support for the idea that someone may have studied this idea of drilling muds having some environmental effects. However vague it may be, we do have some support for that claim.
Answer E, however, has zero support from the passage, and in fact is directly contradicted at lines 43-46: "Companies typically recycle WBMs until their properties are no longer suitable and then, over a period of hours, dump the entire batch into the sea." Not continuous discharge, but a one-time dump. Since there is at least some circumstantial evidence for answer C, but none for E and some actually contradicting E, E must be the better answer and the credited response.
Remember, don't fight with the answers, or spend time trying to figure out why one answer or another might be acceptable or good. Instead, focus on which answer is the best answer. You might hate it, but as long as you hate it less than you hate the others, go with it. Or, in this case, you might like C, but you should like E even more. Again, go with it - the goal is to pick the best answer, not just a good one.
Good luck!
Adam M. Tyson
PowerScore LSAT, GRE, ACT and SAT Instructor
Follow me on Twitter at
https://twitter.com/LSATadam