- Sun Aug 14, 2011 6:19 pm
#1505
Answer choice (D) is bulletproof, and understanding the concept behind this answer choice is critical, so let's go back to the portion of my previous post that indicates that it appears you are making a Mistaken Negation.
Let's first condense the statement about Wednesdays, poetry, and coffee to:
Wednesday Poetry→ 1/2 priced coffee
Yes, that is stronger than what the stimulus says, but let's just go with that for a second. Under that relationship, we have 1/2 priced coffee every Wednesday. But, the stimulus doesn't say "every," it says ""almost every," and let's say that that clearly means some Wednesdays don't have poetry readings. If you then take that to mean that those Wednesday don't then have 1/2 priced coffee, what you are saying is this:
not Wednesday Poetry → not 1/2 priced coffee
But that's a false inference (in this case, a Mistaken Negation): just because some Wednesdays don't have poetry readings doesn't also mean that there isn't 1/2 priced coffee on those days. Maybe Zack's runs a special on the days without poetry readings that gives consumers 1/2 priced coffee.
So, we know that on most Wednesdays Zack's offers 1/2 priced coffee, and it is possible that on the Wednesdays without poetry there is also 1/2 priced coffee. Abstractly, when the sufficient condition occurs, we know the necessary also occurs, but it is also possible that the necessary condition can occur when the sufficient condition has not occurred. that understanding of the last part is what is being tested in (D).
If that's not entirely clear, consider the following analogy:
On most but not all Wednesdays I go to work, and whenever I go to work I wear shoes.
What about the Wednesdays I don't go to work? Is it possible for me to wear shoes? Yes, definitely, so we can infer that on "most if not all Wednesdays" I wear shoes.
Does that help?