- Fri Apr 08, 2022 4:11 pm
#94682
Annabelle,
I don't see how the reference to " dialects of various ethnic enclaves" says anything about sources specifically. There is arguably diversity there, but not of sources. I think an analogy can help there. A lot of myths in various different cultures speak of a hero defeating an evil beast, an embodiment of evil. There's thus an adaptation of this idea into a diverse number of different cultural idioms, and, of course, each culture's myth will have some specifics of it even if the idea is general. Similarly, talk-story's being performed in a diversity of dialects does not mean it originates from a diversity of different sources.
The second point is less clear, but I think there is generally not enough diversity in cultural derivations to feel safe saying this - it's been adapted to new subject matter or new Western forms of discourse, but how diverse is that? I think that's unclear, so I'm not comfortable with that part. I think the first paragraph of mine makes it clear that "diversity of ancient sources" is off the mark, so I'd rely on that - even if this second part is right (which is debatable), a half right, half wrong answer is completely wrong.
"Scholarly appreciation" doesn't require much of a positive attitude by the author. The author is writing about a genre and thinks it's interesting enough to write about - that's about all required for that. I can have a "scholarly appreciation" for the musical genre of jazz, even if I don't really like jazz or "get it" myself - I can recognize from what I learn about it that it's a thing worthy of study and a fitting genre for the expression of musical genius. Similarly, the author can appreciate talk-story without our being clear whether the author actually likes it.
Robert Carroll