LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

General questions relating to LSAT Logical Reasoning.
 rameday
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: May 07, 2014
|
#15526
So I had a quick question. I remember in the module it mentioned that a classic defender assumption question was where the stimulus concluded that on the basis of a tiger no longer being present in location A it was exitinct. So a defender assumption would be that the tiger had not moved to another region of the world.

Would another defender assumption also be that the researchers had checked everywhere else in the earth? Or would that justify the conclusion?

A
 Steve Stein
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1153
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#15534
Hi,

Interesting question! If the argument was that a certain species was not in a particular location, it must be extinct. One defender assumption upon this argument is based is that the species not does exist in any other location, and would be that if the species were in that location, the researchers would have been able to detect it. If you take away either of these assumption, that would refute the author's conclusion.

I hope that's helpful! Please let me know whether this is clear--thanks!

Steve
 rameday
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: May 07, 2014
|
#15560
yes this helps
 Steve Stein
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 1153
  • Joined: Apr 11, 2011
|
#16132
Hi Rameday,

That's great--I appreciate your response, and I'm glad that you found that helpful.

Thanks again!

~Steve

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.