- Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:41 am
#16734
Hi,
I was wondering if you can clear up a difference between these two types of Flaws that can occur in a question.
I was reading the blog that talks about False Dilemma's and I got a bit confused. It gave an example about voters and their lack of support for a suggested amendment. Reading that example, I automatically thought of another type of flaw: Errors in the use of evidence. Could it be said that with the same example the author makes a reasoning error by saying that evidence of voters against a position is enough to prove that there is evidence of voters for a position?
Or is this pretty much still saying the same thing as a false dilemma?
Could you please clarify this for me and explain how in that example that the flaw is a false dilemma instead of an error in the use of evidence?
Thanks,
Anoop
P.S. the Blog was entitled "Flaws in LSAT Logical Reasoning: False Dilemma" posted on April 17, 2013
I was wondering if you can clear up a difference between these two types of Flaws that can occur in a question.
I was reading the blog that talks about False Dilemma's and I got a bit confused. It gave an example about voters and their lack of support for a suggested amendment. Reading that example, I automatically thought of another type of flaw: Errors in the use of evidence. Could it be said that with the same example the author makes a reasoning error by saying that evidence of voters against a position is enough to prove that there is evidence of voters for a position?
Or is this pretty much still saying the same thing as a false dilemma?
Could you please clarify this for me and explain how in that example that the flaw is a false dilemma instead of an error in the use of evidence?
Thanks,
Anoop
P.S. the Blog was entitled "Flaws in LSAT Logical Reasoning: False Dilemma" posted on April 17, 2013