lsatopocalypse wrote:They shut me down, lsac is disappointedly strict.
I'm very sorry to hear that! It was worth a shot, so you don't have to wonder what they would have said.
lsatopocalypse wrote:Also, say I did get accepted to any these schools with a February score, but they offer little to no scholarships (apparently most schools would have already given most, or all, of their money to earlier applicants), would it be a bad thing to decline their offers and reapply next cycle in hopes that I would receive better offers?
Well, if I read this paragraph together with your prior paragraph, I get that although you don't
want to wait a year to attend law school, you
could wait under the right circumstances.
It is true that most schools will have given out most if not all of their scholarship money to catch attractive candidates earlier in the process, and you would need to call each of your target schools to see what their respective positions are. I will say that I took the February LSAT in 2003 and was admitted that same year to George Mason, which is a decent school but was well below my qualifications (I happened to live 5 miles from the campus and it was the only school to which I applied).
So, bottom line is to call the schools in which you're interested to see if they accept the February LSAT and if they would potentially have any scholarships available. If they accept applications but won't have scholarship money available -- and if you would have been a candidate for scholarship money if you had applied earlier in the cycle -- then you should sit down and make a business decision regarding the value of that lost money compared to the costs of delaying admission by a year. It's a decision that really only you can make, and one that requires a great deal of data to make well.
Best of luck to you,
Ron