LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#22894
Complete Question Explanation

Strengthen-CE. The correct answer choice is (A)

The conclusion to this stimulus is the assertion that medieval Arab poets were, unlike the Arab philosophers at the time, not very interested in Homer, who is commonly referenced in Aristotle's Poetics. This conclusion is based on the fact that unlike many Greek texts, Homer was not translated into Arabic at the time. So, the authors causal argument is as follows: Lack of interest in Homer → No ancient Arabic translations of Homer

The stimulus is followed by a strengthen question. In order to strengthen this argument, we might look for the answer choice which eliminates other possible causes, or for the answer which in some other way bolsters the claim that apathy led to the lack of any translated version.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice, since it rules out another possible cause. If the ancient Arabs hadn't had access to Homer, that would provide a different explanation for the lack of any translation. This answer choice provides that they did have access, increasing the likelihood that the lack of Homer in translated form was based on apathy.

Answer choice (B): Any similarity between Arab works and those of Homer is irrelevant to the question of whether there was ancient Arab interest in Homer's works specifically, so this answer choice is incorrect.

Answer choice (C): Like answer choice (B) above, this choice is completely irrelevant to the question of what caused the lack of medieval Arabic Homeric translations.

Answer choice (D): Any interest by modern Arab poets has no effect on the discussion from the stimulus, which involves only medieval Arabs and the works that they translated.

Answer choice (E): An overlapping interest in drama does not strengthen or weaken the causal argument in the stimulus, and the presence of dramatic works and performances among medieval Arabs tells us nothing regarding the medieval Arabs' feelings about Homer.
 psik
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: Jul 13, 2015
|
#20430
Q stem: Medieval arabs had manuscripts of many ancient greek texts..

I can and cannot see how A can be the answer.

If A is the answer that means there was no demand evne though Arab Translator had access to a greek text of it; hence, A would strengthen


But the second stimulus sattes that "because a poet intersted in the Poetics would have certainly have wanted to read Homer, to which epics Aristotle frequnelty refers".
Well then according to this stimulus, if arab poets wanted to read Homer there must have been demand, so in this case, how can answer choice be correct, for if the arab translateors possessed copies + there was demand by arab poets, then we should have had it translated well before the modern times.
 Clay Cooper
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 241
  • Joined: Jul 03, 2015
|
#20445
Hi psik,

Thanks for your question. This stimulus is a bit daunting!

I think you have just gotten turned around in your understanding of the conclusion. The conclusion is, specifically, that medieval Arab poets did NOT have any interest in Aristotle's works; we know this because if they had been interested, they'd have demanded to read Homer and thus the translators would have translated the Greek copies of Homer into Arabic.

The reason answer choice A strengthens the argument is that it establishes that these medieval translators definitely had access to the original Greek versions of Homer's epics, and thus there would have been nothing to prevent them from translating these epics into Arabic had the Arab poets wanted to read them.
User avatar
 crispycrispr
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: Apr 08, 2021
|
#86808
Hi,

Can someone better help me understand why (C) isn't right? I chose (C) because I thought if the medieval translators translated Greek, and the medieval poets still didn't want to read it, that showed that they weren't interested, and so it strengthens. I'm not understanding how there's a cause & effect reasoning in the stimulus--the last sentence just seemed like another premise?

Thanks!
User avatar
 Ryan Twomey
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: Mar 04, 2021
|
#86827
Hey Crispr Crispr,


The stimulus has a lot of moving parts so I will write them down.

Conclusion: Medieval Arabic poets were not interested in Aristotle's poetics.
Premise 1: If interested in Aristotle Poetics you have wanted to read Homer
Premise 2: Homer was not translated to arabic until modern times
Premise 3 (at the beginning of the stimulus): if there was a demand for a manuscript it was translated to arabic
Assumption#1 the poets had access to Homer and they just didn't want homer's work translated.
Assumtion #2 The poets weren't capable of reading Homer in its original form
Assumption #3: the argument was assuming the poets were not interested in homer simply because they did not have his work translated.

A strengthens our argument because it is one of our exact assumptions. This stimulus is very close to being valid and there are a couple of conditional statments that are probably worth mapping out which would help you see the gaps in the argument.

Answer choice C is our second best answer but in the end it does not help us strengthen the conclusion. We know the poets were capable of translating work. We want to help establish that the poets did not want to translate Homer because they were not interested. This answer choice does not help us with that fact whereas A does.


I hope all this helps.

Best,
Ryan
User avatar
 crispycrispr
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: Apr 08, 2021
|
#86845
Ryan Twomey wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 10:07 pm Hey Crispr Crispr,


The stimulus has a lot of moving parts so I will write them down.

Conclusion: Medieval Arabic poets were not interested in Aristotle's poetics.
Premise 1: If interested in Aristotle Poetics you have wanted to read Homer
Premise 2: Homer was not translated to arabic until modern times
Premise 3 (at the beginning of the stimulus): if there was a demand for a manuscript it was translated to arabic
Assumption#1 the poets had access to Homer and they just didn't want homer's work translated.
Assumtion #2 The poets weren't capable of reading Homer in its original form
Assumption #3: the argument was assuming the poets were not interested in homer simply because they did not have his work translated.

A strengthens our argument because it is one of our exact assumptions. This stimulus is very close to being valid and there are a couple of conditional statments that are probably worth mapping out which would help you see the gaps in the argument.

Answer choice C is our second best answer but in the end it does not help us strengthen the conclusion. We know the poets were capable of translating work. We want to help establish that the poets did not want to translate Homer because they were not interested. This answer choice does not help us with that fact whereas A does.


I hope all this helps.

Best,
Ryan
Thanks, Ryan! Breaking it down like that definitely helps. I have a follow-up question: is this question a necessary-assumption-and-strengthen hybrid? Or is it just an inherent nature of strengthen/weaken questions and we should be on the lookout for assumptions?
User avatar
 Poonam Agrawal
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: Apr 23, 2021
|
#86869
Hi crispycrispr!

This is a regular strengthen question. It is usually a good idea to be on the lookout for these assumptions as you do strengthen/weaken questions!

An assumption is basically just a statement that is not directly written in the stimulus, but implied. When things are implied, you enter a sort of gray area where things could be true, but you are not 100% certain. When working on strengthen questions, you want to make any of these implicit assumptions stronger by directly writing them into the argument. With weaken questions, you want to do the opposite - take any gray area and enlarge it so that it creates a hole in the argument. Hope this helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.