- Thu May 05, 2016 12:14 pm
#23947
Complete Question Explanation
Assumption. The correct answer choice is (B)
This passage is basically a critique of political campaign coverage, based on the claim that the press reports on advisors, and the process of the campaign, rather than on the candidates and their positions on substantive issues. The author concludes that voters lose out by being deprived of information necessary to informed decision making.
Answer choice (A): While the author does draw the analogy to chess, it is not assumed that this is the most appropriate analogy. If we negate this answer choice, it has no effect on the strength of the argument.
Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. It is the supporter assumption that the candidates are indeed taking substantive policy positions. Without this assumption, the argument fails: If the candidates aren’t taking substantive positions, the voters aren’t being deprived of information necessary for informed decision making.
Answer choice (C): The argument does not assume that substantive issues are determined by the press, but rather that there are substantive candidate positions which the press chooses not to cover.
Answer choice (D): The inability to make informed decision is argued to be based on poor press coverage, not assumed to be based on lack of voter attention to the election.
Answer choice (E): This is an opposite answer—the author specifically distinguishes these two types of reporting, arguing that one is preferable to the other in political campaign reporting.
Assumption. The correct answer choice is (B)
This passage is basically a critique of political campaign coverage, based on the claim that the press reports on advisors, and the process of the campaign, rather than on the candidates and their positions on substantive issues. The author concludes that voters lose out by being deprived of information necessary to informed decision making.
Answer choice (A): While the author does draw the analogy to chess, it is not assumed that this is the most appropriate analogy. If we negate this answer choice, it has no effect on the strength of the argument.
Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice. It is the supporter assumption that the candidates are indeed taking substantive policy positions. Without this assumption, the argument fails: If the candidates aren’t taking substantive positions, the voters aren’t being deprived of information necessary for informed decision making.
Answer choice (C): The argument does not assume that substantive issues are determined by the press, but rather that there are substantive candidate positions which the press chooses not to cover.
Answer choice (D): The inability to make informed decision is argued to be based on poor press coverage, not assumed to be based on lack of voter attention to the election.
Answer choice (E): This is an opposite answer—the author specifically distinguishes these two types of reporting, arguing that one is preferable to the other in political campaign reporting.