- Fri May 06, 2016 10:31 am
#24035
Complete Question Explanation
Justify the Conclusion—PR. The correct answer choice is (C)
The conclusion of this Stimulus is stated in the first sentence: current legislation requiring designated smoking and non-smoking sections on the premises of privately owned businesses is an unjustifiable intrusion into the private sector. The remainder of the Stimulus is simply a premise for that conclusion.
The Question Stem indicates that this is a Justify-Principle question type. In Justify questions, one seeks to add something to the Stimulus in order to arrive at the stated conclusion. In the Principle sub-category of Justify questions, the added Answer Choice will be a principle which will be broader than the specific situation presented in the Stimulus.
Answer Choice (A): This answer does not supply a necessary principle to reach the conclusion that the legislation is an unjustifiable intrusion into the private sector. In this case, the conclusion states that the legislation is an unwarranted intrusion into the private sector even though some individuals might be harmed. Answer Choice (A) states that the intrusion is justified when individuals might be harmed. Answer Choice (A) should be eliminated.
Answer Choice (B: This answer states that the right to breathe safe air supersedes the right of business to be free of government intrusion. This is the opposite of what the conclusion states in the Stimulus, and thus, is an incorrect Answer Choice. Answer Choice (B) should be eliminated.
Answer Choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. It states that the right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government to protect the individual. There are two competing interests here: the right of businesses to self-determination and the duty of the government to protect people. This answer choice states that the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion is more important than the duty of the government to protect individuals.
Answer Choice (D): This answer states that it is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace. While this might be true, it is not necessary to establish the conclusion contained in the Stimulus that the right of businesses to be free from governmental intrusion supersedes the duty of government to protect people. Answer Choice (D) should be eliminated.
Answer Choice (E): This answer is incorrect and should be eliminated. Compromise is not the issue here; in fact, the conclusion holds that the right for business self-determination will prevail against the duty of government. There is no compromise in the Stimulus; therefore any Answer Choice that advocates compromise should be rejected.
Justify the Conclusion—PR. The correct answer choice is (C)
The conclusion of this Stimulus is stated in the first sentence: current legislation requiring designated smoking and non-smoking sections on the premises of privately owned businesses is an unjustifiable intrusion into the private sector. The remainder of the Stimulus is simply a premise for that conclusion.
The Question Stem indicates that this is a Justify-Principle question type. In Justify questions, one seeks to add something to the Stimulus in order to arrive at the stated conclusion. In the Principle sub-category of Justify questions, the added Answer Choice will be a principle which will be broader than the specific situation presented in the Stimulus.
Answer Choice (A): This answer does not supply a necessary principle to reach the conclusion that the legislation is an unjustifiable intrusion into the private sector. In this case, the conclusion states that the legislation is an unwarranted intrusion into the private sector even though some individuals might be harmed. Answer Choice (A) states that the intrusion is justified when individuals might be harmed. Answer Choice (A) should be eliminated.
Answer Choice (B: This answer states that the right to breathe safe air supersedes the right of business to be free of government intrusion. This is the opposite of what the conclusion states in the Stimulus, and thus, is an incorrect Answer Choice. Answer Choice (B) should be eliminated.
Answer Choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. It states that the right of businesses to self-determination overrides whatever right or duty the government to protect the individual. There are two competing interests here: the right of businesses to self-determination and the duty of the government to protect people. This answer choice states that the right of businesses to be free from government intrusion is more important than the duty of the government to protect individuals.
Answer Choice (D): This answer states that it is the duty of private businesses to protect employees from harm in the workplace. While this might be true, it is not necessary to establish the conclusion contained in the Stimulus that the right of businesses to be free from governmental intrusion supersedes the duty of government to protect people. Answer Choice (D) should be eliminated.
Answer Choice (E): This answer is incorrect and should be eliminated. Compromise is not the issue here; in fact, the conclusion holds that the right for business self-determination will prevail against the duty of government. There is no compromise in the Stimulus; therefore any Answer Choice that advocates compromise should be rejected.