- Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:50 pm
#2584
Hi Jon,
First, let me say that I am a big fan of your virtual modules. They have been extremely helpful. So it's weird that I feel that I already know you as an instructor, and feel grateful to you even though this is the first time I'm asking for your help.
I just reread the passage, and realized my problem. It has to do with my comprehension of the words "immediate successors" in the question. When I first read the question, I immediately thought of Milman Parry's son Adam, and decided that Adam represents Milman Parry's immediate successors. I then reread the last paragraph (48-61) and chose B because B basically summarizes it. But now I realize that "immediate successors" actually refer to "the scholars" who take up his legacy (38). Rereading lines 38 to 44, it makes sense to me now why the answer is D. I see how B is a trap, but my question now is how to avoid this type of trap in the future. The only potential clue that I might have noticed is that Adam Parry is one person, whereas the question asks "immediate successors" in the plural. But under the time constraints, I didn't make a big deal out of it, and thought that Adam Parry could represent the other successors. Since the actual passage does not say whether the "immediate successors" are the scholars who took up Milman Parry's legacy, or Adam Parry, I am not sure that I could get this type of trick question right in a similar type of situation in the future. So please instruct what I should do to get this type of question right. Thank you.