LSAT and Law School Admissions Forum

Get expert LSAT preparation and law school admissions advice from PowerScore Test Preparation.

 Administrator
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 8950
  • Joined: Feb 02, 2011
|
#26761
Please post below with any questions!
 chian9010
  • Posts: 81
  • Joined: Jun 08, 2018
|
#50093
Could anyone tell me why answer choice A is incorrect?
 Vaidehi Joshi
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 23
  • Joined: Aug 16, 2018
|
#53454
(A) is wrong because we are told that the system was replaced, sure, but not really WHY--and certainly not that it "was eventually abandoned because it was not capable of representing quantity and other abstractions." The only thing we are told about it's replacement comes from:
The token system, essentially a system of three dimensional

nouns, was replaced in about 3100 B.C.

by a system of marks on clay tablets.
On the other hand, (B) is supported by:
Many forms are figurative, such as bowls or

jars with handles, suggesting that villagers’ crafts

were becoming more diversified and sophisticated.
 alex.r.berson@gmail.com
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: Jan 08, 2024
|
#107841
Hi there,

I'm not sure why (B) is correct over (C) - the author mentions in the second paragraph "Noting that these inscriptions are clearly traceable to later, known inscriptions of farm products" and nowhere else in the passage is it mentioned how these tokens are understood.

I see some evidence for (B) namely the growth of industry part of the passage but it doesn't feel as strong as (C) here.

Please advise.
User avatar
 Dana D
PowerScore Staff
  • PowerScore Staff
  • Posts: 385
  • Joined: Feb 06, 2024
|
#107980
Hey Alex,

This type of question is a MBT, meaning the correct answer will be one which must be true based on what the passage says. In order to test whether your answer is correct for a MBT, you can ask yourself whether the information could be false. In this case, is it possible that there was another way the tokens came to be understood? The passage says the fact that the tokens had agricultural symbols on them allowed Schmandt-Besserat to hypothesize about what the tokens were used for, but we don't know that this is the only way historians came to understand what the tokens meant. It's possible they came to understand the tokens another way (thus negating answer choice (C)) but that it was the agricultural tokens which let Schmandt-Besserat make their hypothesis.

In contrast, answer choice (B) MBT. We are told the villager's crafts became more sophisticated and diverse (line 37) and we are told that the tokens evolved to represent additional items (line 33-35).

Hope that helps!

Get the most out of your LSAT Prep Plus subscription.

Analyze and track your performance with our Testing and Analytics Package.