Sherry001 wrote:Hello ,
I had a difficult time understanding the flaw for this question .. After spending my life on it this is what I came up with could you please see if my reasoning is correct ?
Also if you could please help me get rid of D as its giving my nightmares ! Thanks so much.
1- The only motives that influence human actions --> arise from self interest
Conclusion: self interest is the chief influence on human action. (Self interest-> the chief influence on human action).
My analysis before jumping into the answers:I saw two flaws . I thought flaw #1 is that the author is mistaking a sufficient for a necessary. And flaw #2 the author takes something arising from a situation to be conclude that it's the primary factor when in fact so many other things could also have an influence on human action.
A) wrong . The author doesn't deny the causal relationship.
B) correct : the author takes the fact that actions arise from self interest to show that it's the chief reason.
C)no temporal flaw here.
D) seemed very attractive to me and still can't get rid of it.
E)no contradiction. It doesn't undermine its premise.
Sherry
Hello Sherry001,
Sorry you spent your life on it.
Anyway, first off, this may be an o.k. diagram of the first part of the stimulus:
Motives influencing ALL human actions
self interest.
So a mistaken reversal of that would say that something from self interest must influence all human actions...but maybe that mistaken reversal is indeed a mistake! For example, maybe I have a desire to enjoy visualizing blueberry ice cream, but not to actually eat it (!). So that desire would be "self interest" (pleasurable), but not influence any actions maybe... Point being that that mistaken reversal above, is not exactly equivalent to what you said, "(Self interest-> the chief influence on human action)", which adds the idea of "chief". So it's not exactly a sufficient-necessary problem, though it almost seems like one a little.
Your "And flaw #2 the author takes something arising from a situation to be conclude that it's the primary factor when in fact so many other things could also have an influence on human action." may be more correct. Let's say that everyone in a neighborhood gets a campaign flyer, but only 85% of them see the candidate in person. Even though the flyer is more *widespread* an influence (everyone sees it), maybe seeing the candidate up close is more *powerful*, and is the deciding factor in the election.
As for answer D, it's almost a mistaken reversal of answer B. B basically says, "assumes that something occurring frequently means it's the most powerful". D says, "concludes that, because an influence is the paramount influence on a particular pattern or class of events, that influence is the only influence on that pattern or class of events"; the stimulus didn't say that self-interest is the only influence on events, but that it's the only one that influences all human actions (so that it's highly frequent). So D doesn't even come up to the level of being a mistaken reversal!
Your analyses of the other three answers choices seem pretty good. Good job overall!
Hope this helps,
David