- Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:45 pm
#26306
Complete Question Explanation
Flaw in the Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (C)
The stimulus states that Michaela’s play will be performed by the theater this season, and we know that critical acclaim is one of the main factors considered in the selection of plays to perform. However, this does not mean that critical acclaim is the only factor considered, nor that critical acclaim is required in order for a play to be selected. The conclusion mistakenly concludes that Michaela must be a critically acclaimed playwright. In other words, the author concludes that critical acclaim is necessary for a play to be chosen. There is nothing in the premises to substantiate such a strong claim.
Answer Choice (A): This answer choice describes a Mistaken Reversal. The author did not make this mistake. If the author had made this mistake, she would have said: “You must be critically acclaimed to be selected. Michaela is critically acclaimed. Therefore, her play was selected.” The argument in this stimulus never made this mistake.
Answer Choice (B): This answer choice describes an error in causal reasoning. There was no causal reasoning present in this stimulus, so the answer choice is incorrect.
Answer Choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. The author did confuse a main factor for a factor that was necessary for selection. The facts here do not indicate critical acclaim was ever required for a play to be selected.
Answer Choice (D): The only source in this argument is the production director. There is no reason to suspect that the production director is unreliable in describing one of the main factors in selecting plays to perform.
Answer Choice (E): Once again, this answer choice describes a causal error. Specifically, this answer choice is suggesting that the author confused a cause for an effect. Since there was no causal reasoning in this stimulus, this answer choice does not accurately describe the error in the stimulus and is therefore incorrect.
Flaw in the Reasoning. The correct answer choice is (C)
The stimulus states that Michaela’s play will be performed by the theater this season, and we know that critical acclaim is one of the main factors considered in the selection of plays to perform. However, this does not mean that critical acclaim is the only factor considered, nor that critical acclaim is required in order for a play to be selected. The conclusion mistakenly concludes that Michaela must be a critically acclaimed playwright. In other words, the author concludes that critical acclaim is necessary for a play to be chosen. There is nothing in the premises to substantiate such a strong claim.
Answer Choice (A): This answer choice describes a Mistaken Reversal. The author did not make this mistake. If the author had made this mistake, she would have said: “You must be critically acclaimed to be selected. Michaela is critically acclaimed. Therefore, her play was selected.” The argument in this stimulus never made this mistake.
Answer Choice (B): This answer choice describes an error in causal reasoning. There was no causal reasoning present in this stimulus, so the answer choice is incorrect.
Answer Choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. The author did confuse a main factor for a factor that was necessary for selection. The facts here do not indicate critical acclaim was ever required for a play to be selected.
Answer Choice (D): The only source in this argument is the production director. There is no reason to suspect that the production director is unreliable in describing one of the main factors in selecting plays to perform.
Answer Choice (E): Once again, this answer choice describes a causal error. Specifically, this answer choice is suggesting that the author confused a cause for an effect. Since there was no causal reasoning in this stimulus, this answer choice does not accurately describe the error in the stimulus and is therefore incorrect.