- Thu Dec 12, 2024 6:45 pm
#111030
Hi noradwd1!
To address (A), that answer choice states that the argument "takes the views of one lawyer to represent the views of all lawyers." Let's look at the conclusion of the stimulus, which is its final sentence: "This comment from a prestigious attorney provides appalling evidence that, in the face of television, even some legal professionals are losing their ability to distinguish fiction from reality." One reason that (A) seems problematic is that this is a conclusion made about "some" legal professionals, whereas (A) is referring to "all" lawyers. So the author isn't taking one to represent all.
By contrast, answer choice (E) states that the argument "ignores the part of the lawyer’s remark that indicates an awareness of the difference between reality and fiction." In the stimulus, the prominent lawyer stated that "Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own." So the lawyer is aware that Burr is not a lawyer even though he plays one on TV but still feels that the community lost one of its own. That is to say, the lawyer is aware of the difference between reality and fiction.