sari.lerner16 wrote:I am still not seeing how B is correct. He seems to agree with the modular theory of mind.
Hey Sari,
I don't think it's a proper interpretation of the passage to say that the author agrees with the modular theory. The author takes a stance against the theory around line 15: "It may in fact be that neither mental activity, nor the physical processes that constitute it, are decomposable into independent modules."
After that, the author spends a considerable amount of time working through critiques of the theory, which the author also appears to agree with. Consider around line 50, for example: "One immediately obvious (but usually unremarked) problem is that this method obscures the fact that the entire brain is active in both conditions."
What I think might be leading you astray is that the author calls the theory "attractive" in the final line of the passage. However, calling a theory attractive is not the same thing as calling it correct. In fact, by calling the theory attractive in the context of its illustration by what the author considers a flawed technique (the subtractive method), the author is coming out strongly
against the theory.
I'm sure we can think of an explanation for a phenomenon that might be attractive or alluring but ultimately wrong. For instance: the moon is yellowish and full of holes because it's made of Swiss cheese.
Hope that helps!
Ben