- Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:32 pm
#33719
LAM,
Imagine I didn't have the Iliad in front of me but wanted to describe a particular scene in it. I've read it before, and I saw that movie Troy, but I have neither memorized, so when I tell the story, I might be getting the order of events wrong, getting the names wrong, or doing something else that doesn't quite match the canonical version of the written text (if there is such a thing - I'm not a Homeric scholar!). So when I tell you what happened, I'm relying on my memory of reading the story and knowing a bit about the general plot. I may fill in details where I forget things. I may leave some things out because I'm not sure about them. It's a story I'm personally remembering, and my relation of that story to you depends on quirks of my personality and memory. Thus, what answer choice (C) says is true - it's a partially idiosyncratic memory of someone else's story. The events didn't happen to me. I'm telling a story about something else. I am not necessarily telling you that my memory is faulty, or relating a narrative of my reading of the book. Instead, I'm telling the story itself, a story in which I don't appear, in a manner which is unique to me.
And this is why answer choice (B) is not correct. Although my memory of the story is based on things that happened to me, those events in my life form no part of the actual narrative I'm telling you. Thus, it's not a personal narrative of my past. You're right that my past experiences shape the narrative, but they shape the telling of it, and don't enter into the story I tell.
As Charlie pointed out, this is a very difficult passage and question. Infamously so, even! I hope my explanation is helpful.
Robert Carroll