I got this one right but I wasn't very sure about my answer so I wanted to make sure I completely understood it.
I diagrammed the argument as:
economy weak
prices constant
economy weak
unemployment rises
investment decreases
(C) must be true because of the contrapositive of the second diagram.
My reason for eliminating (B) was that the passage never states a direct relationship between unemployment and prices, so (B) could be true. Is that correct?
Then for the either/or statements, I followed the diagramming either/or strategy in the Logical Reasoning Bible. The stuff in parentheses are what I determined the statement's validity to be based on the argument I wrote on the very top.
For (A):
~economy weak
investment decreases (could be true)
~investment decreases
economy weak (must be false)
For (D):
~economy weak
prices constant (could be true)
~prices constant
~economy weak (must be true)
For (E):
~unemployment rises
~economy weak (must be true)
economy weak
unemployment rises (must be true)
So is (A) the answer because (D) and (E) all have at least one must be true? And does that mean for an either/or you just need at least one of the two diagrams to be must be true?
Thank you!