- Wed May 17, 2017 5:44 pm
#34987
Hi Yining Bei,
Generally, it will help us give you a better and more targeted answer if you take the time to tell us how you approached the question, why you chose the answer you did, why you ruled out the correct answer, etc. Plus, doing that will also help you think through the question carefully, and in the long term will help you get better at catching your own mistakes!
In the meantime, though, I'm happy to walk you through E and A. The stimulus tells us that if it was commissioned for the public, it should benefit the public, and we will only know if the public feels it was benefitted by considering popular opinion. However, we have NO idea what the relationship might be between the public actually being benefitted and what the public thinks about whether it was benefitted. The assumption is that those two things are the same. That's my pre-phrase, so I'm going to look for an answer choice that matches that. I find it in E, which connects those two ideas.
A, on the other hand, doesn't address the gap in the stimulus; it does give us a reason why the sculpture should be removed, but it doesn't relate back to the argument being made in any way (it is failing to connect public opinion and benefit to the public). Accordingly, it is NOT an assumption of the argument, because it isn't something on which the argument relies.