- Sat May 27, 2017 12:53 pm
#35434
Complete Question Explanation
(See the complete passage discussion here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14270)
GR, Must. The correct answer choice is (C)
The answer to this question cannot really be prephrased, but it must pass the Fact Test and be
confirmed by the information presented in the passage.
Answer choice (A): There is no basis in the passage for a broad statement about most clinical trials,
and the author does not comment on whether or not appropriate standards are generally met. This
choice fails the Fact Test and cannot be the right answer to this Must Be True question.
Answer choice (B): Although the author does argue for a less restrictive ethical standard, there is
no discussion in the passage about whether or not trials would be held more often under a different
standard.
Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. At the end of the second paragraph, the
author asserts, “...if the standard of theoretical equipoise is adhered to, few comparative clinical trials
could commence and even fewer could proceed to completion.”
Answer choice (D): Although there has been a traditional standard, that does not mean that most
doctors and ethicists agree that it is the proper standard, so this choice fails the Fact Test and should
be eliminated from contention.
Answer choice (E): The author does not say that the majority of comparative trials are undertaken to
help resolve conflicts in opinion—they might be intended simply to test various new treatments, for
example. Since the author does not make this claim, this choice cannot be the right answer choice.
(See the complete passage discussion here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14270)
GR, Must. The correct answer choice is (C)
The answer to this question cannot really be prephrased, but it must pass the Fact Test and be
confirmed by the information presented in the passage.
Answer choice (A): There is no basis in the passage for a broad statement about most clinical trials,
and the author does not comment on whether or not appropriate standards are generally met. This
choice fails the Fact Test and cannot be the right answer to this Must Be True question.
Answer choice (B): Although the author does argue for a less restrictive ethical standard, there is
no discussion in the passage about whether or not trials would be held more often under a different
standard.
Answer choice (C): This is the correct answer choice. At the end of the second paragraph, the
author asserts, “...if the standard of theoretical equipoise is adhered to, few comparative clinical trials
could commence and even fewer could proceed to completion.”
Answer choice (D): Although there has been a traditional standard, that does not mean that most
doctors and ethicists agree that it is the proper standard, so this choice fails the Fact Test and should
be eliminated from contention.
Answer choice (E): The author does not say that the majority of comparative trials are undertaken to
help resolve conflicts in opinion—they might be intended simply to test various new treatments, for
example. Since the author does not make this claim, this choice cannot be the right answer choice.