- Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:00 am
#36747
Complete Question Explanation
(See the complete passage discussion here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14639)
The correct answer choice is (D)
The correct answer choice will likely include the following: (1) institutions seek to profit from the
inventions of their faculty, (2) the majority of institutional policies seem to give universities the rights
to faculty inventions, (3) these policies are questionable based upon their uncertain legal basis, and (4)
there is another policy that seems preferable and that grants faculty members ownership rights.
Answer choice (A): This seems like a very good description of the main point at first. Lines 7-10 discuss
the expectations of universities to profit from faculty research and lines 16-19 discuss the risk of losing
faculty to other commercial interests. However, the phrase “establish clear-cut policies” should be a redflag.
A very clear-cut policy which does not provide appropriate flexibility to faculty will do nothing to
curtail the risk of losing faculty to research corporations or commercial consulting contracts.
Answer choice (B): This answer choice discusses the fourfold classification system mentioned in
paragraph two, but emphasizes that this system “is sufficient to categorize the variety of steps institutions
are taking” to prevent the loss of faculty. The comprehensiveness of Patricia Chew’s system is irrelevant
to the passage’s main focus on the need for institutions to choose an appropriate policy.
Answer choice (C): According to the passage, only faculty-oriented institutions “adopt the common law
presumption that faculty alone own their inventions.” But this approach does not guarantee that faculty
will not leave for commercial firms or research corporations. Furthermore, the passage does not assert
that all institutions should adopt the faculty-oriented approach. It only states that they must “provide the
appropriate level of flexibility” so that faculty will not be tempted to leave (lines 23-24). This answer
choice is too extreme and too narrow.
Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. Answer choice (D) is a good paraphrase of
the transition between the third and fourth paragraphs. For this reason, some test takers may deem this
answer choice too narrow to describe the main point of the passage, but the test makers have included
all of the necessary elements in this sentence. It addresses all four policies, along with the respective
motivations of universities and researchers regarding the exploitation of faculty inventions.
Answer choice (E): Although the third paragraph claims that the policies discussed in the preceding
paragraph are based upon a presumption that is contrary to common law, it does conclude that these
policies are indefensible. The third paragraph also suggests that these policies may take advantage of
“faculty’s limited knowledge of their rights” (lines 55-56), but does not claim that these policies go
unchallenged. This answer choice also fails to address the faculty-oriented institutional policy.
(See the complete passage discussion here: lsat/viewtopic.php?t=14639)
The correct answer choice is (D)
The correct answer choice will likely include the following: (1) institutions seek to profit from the
inventions of their faculty, (2) the majority of institutional policies seem to give universities the rights
to faculty inventions, (3) these policies are questionable based upon their uncertain legal basis, and (4)
there is another policy that seems preferable and that grants faculty members ownership rights.
Answer choice (A): This seems like a very good description of the main point at first. Lines 7-10 discuss
the expectations of universities to profit from faculty research and lines 16-19 discuss the risk of losing
faculty to other commercial interests. However, the phrase “establish clear-cut policies” should be a redflag.
A very clear-cut policy which does not provide appropriate flexibility to faculty will do nothing to
curtail the risk of losing faculty to research corporations or commercial consulting contracts.
Answer choice (B): This answer choice discusses the fourfold classification system mentioned in
paragraph two, but emphasizes that this system “is sufficient to categorize the variety of steps institutions
are taking” to prevent the loss of faculty. The comprehensiveness of Patricia Chew’s system is irrelevant
to the passage’s main focus on the need for institutions to choose an appropriate policy.
Answer choice (C): According to the passage, only faculty-oriented institutions “adopt the common law
presumption that faculty alone own their inventions.” But this approach does not guarantee that faculty
will not leave for commercial firms or research corporations. Furthermore, the passage does not assert
that all institutions should adopt the faculty-oriented approach. It only states that they must “provide the
appropriate level of flexibility” so that faculty will not be tempted to leave (lines 23-24). This answer
choice is too extreme and too narrow.
Answer choice (D): This is the correct answer choice. Answer choice (D) is a good paraphrase of
the transition between the third and fourth paragraphs. For this reason, some test takers may deem this
answer choice too narrow to describe the main point of the passage, but the test makers have included
all of the necessary elements in this sentence. It addresses all four policies, along with the respective
motivations of universities and researchers regarding the exploitation of faculty inventions.
Answer choice (E): Although the third paragraph claims that the policies discussed in the preceding
paragraph are based upon a presumption that is contrary to common law, it does conclude that these
policies are indefensible. The third paragraph also suggests that these policies may take advantage of
“faculty’s limited knowledge of their rights” (lines 55-56), but does not claim that these policies go
unchallenged. This answer choice also fails to address the faculty-oriented institutional policy.